Full disclosure: I’m a co-owner of Black Collar Arms. You’ll be able to configure a highly effective 300 BLK AR pistol with a brace and stay within that ridiculous point system.Īlso look into the Black Collar Arms APS, which is an entirely new category of rear accessory - not a rifle stock, not a pistol brace, but a pistol support - for large format pistols that provides a height-adjustable rear support for taking long shots (great for varmint hunting on those road trips, etc.). Pistol braces aren’t going away, even if absolutely everything in ATF’s draft guidance remains in the final ruling (more likely it will be a subset of the guidance). I’d probably run expanding subs in the home for noise level purposes when shooting suppressed (suppressed supersonic rifle rounds are still very loud when fired in enclosed spaces) and then switch to high velocity supersonic rounds (such as 110 grain V-Max) on those family road trips for better ballistics on coyotes, deer, and other things when you’re outdoors where the likelihood of shooting at something farther away goes way up. 300 Blackout is more than sufficient for home defense, whether with expanding subsonic rounds or with a variety of supersonic options. Models with the recoil system contained within the upper receiver make a lot of sense for portability since you can run a folding pistol brace or stock. The AR platform is always a solid choice. Pros: wide variety of loadings compact when paired with matching BRN-180 lower and side-folding braceĬons: uncertainty over prospective impact of new pistol brace regulations (wish to avoid SBR tax stamp) likely to select supersonic loadings for best terminal ballistics, so any advantage over, e.g., 7.62×39? How well does supersonic ammo suppress? Excessive ballistics for home defense use?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |